Free Essays on Power Corrupts Those Who Possess It (Animal Farm)

Power Corrupts Those Who Possess It Too much power corrupts those who possess it just as Joseph Stalin committed sins against Russia when he gained power, the main character, Napoleon, committed sins against Animal Farm. In the novel Napoleon was corrupted by his power. Napoleon abused and deceived others and finally became what he had rebelled against. Napoleon wronged the inhabitants of Animal Farm. Napoleon terrorized animals by killing many of them. He killed four pigs for communicating with Snowball and he killed three hens for confessing that Snowball came to them in their dreams. Napoleon also affected the animals by making decisions for them. When Napoleon decided that there was no longer a need to sing the Beasts of England, a favorite song, because the rebellion was over, he banned it. He also decided how much food each animal received. In addition, Napoleon changed the seven commandments to benefit him but not the other animals. The fourth commandment about an animal not sleeping in a bed was changed after the pigs started sleeping in beds to ‘no animal shall sleep in a bed with sheets.’ When Napoleon drank alcohol he broke the fifth commandment, and so he changed it to ‘no animal shall drink in excess.’ All the animals of Animal Farm were wronged by Napoleon when he used his power to terrorize them, make decisions for them, and change their commandments. Another way Napoleon abused his power was by deceiving the other animals. He first deceived by false blaming when things went wrong. For example, when the windmill was ruined by a storm, Napoleon said Snowball had destroyed it because he was an enemy. The second time the windmill was attacked by humans was also blamed on Snowball because he supposedly helped them. Napoleon also deceived the animals by using Squealer to spread propaganda. One piece of propaganda arose when Napoleon decided... Free Essays on Power Corrupts Those Who Possess It (Animal Farm) Free Essays on Power Corrupts Those Who Possess It (Animal Farm) Power Corrupts Those Who Possess It Too much power corrupts those who possess it just as Joseph Stalin committed sins against Russia when he gained power, the main character, Napoleon, committed sins against Animal Farm. In the novel Napoleon was corrupted by his power. Napoleon abused and deceived others and finally became what he had rebelled against. Napoleon wronged the inhabitants of Animal Farm. Napoleon terrorized animals by killing many of them. He killed four pigs for communicating with Snowball and he killed three hens for confessing that Snowball came to them in their dreams. Napoleon also affected the animals by making decisions for them. When Napoleon decided that there was no longer a need to sing the Beasts of England, a favorite song, because the rebellion was over, he banned it. He also decided how much food each animal received. In addition, Napoleon changed the seven commandments to benefit him but not the other animals. The fourth commandment about an animal not sleeping in a bed was changed after the pigs started sleeping in beds to ‘no animal shall sleep in a bed with sheets.’ When Napoleon drank alcohol he broke the fifth commandment, and so he changed it to ‘no animal shall drink in excess.’ All the animals of Animal Farm were wronged by Napoleon when he used his power to terrorize them, make decisions for them, and change their commandments. Another way Napoleon abused his power was by deceiving the other animals. He first deceived by false blaming when things went wrong. For example, when the windmill was ruined by a storm, Napoleon said Snowball had destroyed it because he was an enemy. The second time the windmill was attacked by humans was also blamed on Snowball because he supposedly helped them. Napoleon also deceived the animals by using Squealer to spread propaganda. One piece of propaganda arose when Napoleon decided...

Into the Breach!

Into the Breach! Into the Breach! Into the Breach! By Maeve Maddox A reader experienced a moment of doubt when he came across an online essay ending with this line: So, no cry of victory yet. Rather, â€Å"Once more unto the breach, dear friends!† I forget.  Is it supposed to be breach, as in the gap in a broken wall, or breech, as in the part of the gun where you load the projectile, unless the gun is loaded down the muzzle, of course. I guess King Harrys famous speech isnt as famous as it used to be. To the reader who knows his Henry V, the second line answers the question: Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more; Or close the wall up with our English dead. Act Three begins with Henry and his troops surging onto the stage. The men, carrying scaling ladders, are exhausted. Henry is encouraging them to make another assault on the walls of Harfleur. The â€Å"breach† is a gap in the city wall. Where Shakespeare says â€Å"unto,† we now say â€Å"into.† The two words, breach and breech, both derive from a word meaning break. The English word breeches meaning trousers derives from the plural of broc, garment for the legs and trunk. From this plural comes the word breech meaning the part of the body covered by breeches. By extension the word came to be used in other contexts. A breech birth for example, is one in which the child emerges rear-end first. (Or in some manner other than headfirst.) In gunnery the breech is 1. the hindermost part of a piece of ordnance. 2. the part of a cannon behind the bore 3. the corresponding part in a musket or rifle Breech-loading cannon were used during the Hundred Years War. One of Joan of Arcs military skills was the ability to judge their range. The breech-loading rifle came along in the nineteenth century. You can read King Henrys entire rousing speech here. Sad P.S. As an afterthought I did a search to see if anyone was writing into the breech. Oh dear. Its all over the place. Theres even a band that calls itself that. As the professor in The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe asks himself frequently, What do they teach in schools these days? Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Misused Words category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:The Royal Order of Adjectives On Behalf Of vs. In Behalf OfConversational Email

Terrorism Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 3

Terrorism - Assignment Example The arson attack was made with the help of a gallon of gasoline, but there was no major damage done to the Church. In the same month, Ellison with another CSA member firebombed ‘the Beth Shalom synagogue’, which also did no major damage (Hamm, 2007, p. 102). On 2nd November, another failed attack was there by CSA members on the natural gas pipeline that ‘crossed the Red River between Mena and Texarkana, Arkansas’ (Hamm, 2007, p. 102). The CSA members used twenty-three sticks of dynamite to rupture it and expected a riot leading to their holy war, but the dynamites only dented the pipeline. Later on, facing the shortage of money, Ellison guided small groups of his followers to do shoplifting, stealing vehicles and doing other kind of robberies for funds generation. Snell and Thomas, two active members of CSA robbed a pawnshop in Texarkana and during their robbery, Snell murdered a proprietor considering him a Jew, while he was not (Hamm, 2007). The CSA was recognized as a Christian extremist group using military training and weaponry to spread terror. The group kept an extremist religious ideology that claimed their superiority over other races. The whole group had racist ideologies due to which, their targeted other religious and social groups. Richard Snell, an active and racist CSA member brutally killed Louis Bryant, a Black and an Arkansas State Trooper on June 30, 1984. After the incident, Snell escaped from the crime scene and upon finding himself circulated by police officers later on, he opened fire on them, after which, he was shot and taken into custody. The investigative team of Oklahoma Bureau of Investigation found weapons, hatred literature from his vehicle and some other future targeted people’s documents (Wong, 2011). The government paid utmost attention to the extremists group and the FBI and other law enforcement agencies categorized CSA as a serious domestic threat

Infliximab Drug Monograph Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Infliximab Drug Monograph - Research Paper Example In the market, the drug is traded under the brand name of Remicade. The drug’s main manufacturing center is in United States of America. Infliximab Drug Monograph Infliximab is a drug which is used to treat patients who suffer from rheumatoid, Crohn’s diseases, ankylosing sponylitis, ulcerative colitis, and plaque psoriasis. The Infliximab drug can also be explained as an antibody drug which is used to treat chronic inflammatory diseases. It blocks the impact of necrosis factor alpha which is commonly labeled as (TNF alpha). Necrosis factor alpha is a substance manufactured by human cells, which plays a very crucial role in hiking inflammation in human body. Necrosis factor alpha is manufactured in the body immune system, hence Infliximab is used to reduce the effect of necrosis alpha factor in the body parts and most specifically. in the immune system. The generic name used for this drug is Infliximab while the brand name for the drug is Remicade. Patients with heart f ailure should not receive Infliximab unless tested by the doctor on their capability of sustaining the impact of the drug in the body. Additionally, patients with allergic reaction to Infliximab constitutes are also instructed not to use them (Frederic, 2010). Therapeutic Category The Infliximab therapeutic category is antirheumatic, GI anti-inflammatory (Frederic, 2010). Dosage The most effective dosage for infusion is 5mg/kg of Infliximab which should be administered and used for a period of 0-6 weeks. The patient should then be administered with another 5mg/kg for every eight weeks. The second dosage is administered in the situation where the patient is at moderate to severe infusion condition. This dosage applies to adult and pediatric patients only. In the situation where the patient does not respond to the dosage, he/she should be administered with a dosage of 10mg/kg. The required and most effective dosage for moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis is supposed to be 3 mg/kg for the initial 0-6 weeks which should be accompanied by another 3mg/kg for every eight weeks. In the situation where the patient does not respond completely to the drug, he/she should be instructed to take 10mg/kg of Infliximab drug. Alternatively, the doctor should ensure the treatment is conducted for every four weeks to enhance consistency. Other diseases such as ulcerative colitis, plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis should be treated with 5mg/kg for 0-6 weeks which should be followed by5mg/kg for every eight weeks. The ankylosing is better treated by 5mg/kg of Infliximab for the first 0-6 weeks which should be accompanied by 5mg/kg for every 6 weeks. Children are strictly not recommended to use the infliximab drug. Indication Infliximab is used for treating and reducing the symptoms and signs of moderate to severe Crohn disease. The drug has also been confirmed as one of the best drug in treatment of active psoriatic arthritis among the adults and children who are a bove the age of six years. The joint inflammation of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoariatic arthritis among the juvenile are treated using the infliximab drug. The uveitis and sarcoidosis which do not respond positively to traditional therapies are also healed by this drug. The Infliximab drug is also one of the best in the treatment of pediatric patients who have moderate to severe active Crohn diseases. The drug is applied to the patients

A Wack On The Side Of The Head Essay examples -- essays research paper

Acute Ambiguity Roger von Oech, the author of A Whack on the Side of the Head, makes an unusual offer that thinking at random will increase the efficiency at which ideas become more abundant. This particular concept is certainly an original way to come up with new, fresh problem solving techniques. Ambiguity in the world can help new ideas flow for anyone when looked at in a creative way.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Chapter seven begins by explaining an example that would make the case against using ambiguity. In fact, the title of chapter seven is â€Å"Avoid Ambiguity†. While it is true that vague statements leave questions unanswered, the traditional idea behind gathering information is to find specific details and clear communicated information. Ambiguous communication can be dangerous in some situations where the consequences of not understanding the complete picture can cause harm. Therefore, communication of specific information is needed in some situations, however, the author then goes on to explain how the ambiguous statement or event can lead to more accurate and applicable solutions.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In the event that a problem would arise in a company or social gathering that would call for a creative solution, random thinking techniques would be incredibly applicable. The author gives great examples of creative solutions and brainstorming techniques from the simple event such as a fundraiser all the way to complicated matters such as national defe...

Book Review – a Matter of Principle

A Review of Conrad Black’s A Matter of Principle Conrad Moffat Black, former newspaper tycoon, historian and celebrity is an interesting man, to say the least. The topic of his fall from professional, financial and social grace is legendary and is one that still elicits numerous newspaper columns and debates. The latest matter of interest in his lengthy protracted battle is his extraordinary memoir, A Matter of Principle. Written largely from his prison cell in Coleman Federal Correction Complex in Florida, the book is a compelling narrative of his tribulations.With his command of the English language, Lord Black is at once strikingly eloquent, acidly cynical, ferociously angry, and surprisingly funny. However, the book teeters at the edge of being nothing more than a self-glorified memoir, laced with attacks on detractors. In the first three chapters of the book, Black charts his illustrious newspaper career, beginning from U. K. ’s Telegraph to his crowning achievemen t – National Post. And in between his tales of rubbing shoulders with the powerful, he offers his take on world affairs, yet almost ironically maintains that he has never exercised his power to sway public policy.He also spares a page-and-half to rant on Jean Chretien for opposing his proposed dual citizenship (Black was to be inducted into the British House of Lords). Near the end of Chapter three, the readers are also introduced to some of Black’s questionable activities – the sale of Hollinger Inc. ’s newspaper properties to CanWest, and the resultant non-compete payments. Chapter four marks the beginning of Black’s misfortune as he describes the investigation by Hollinger’s audit committee into the company’s funds.The Hollinger board, summarized by Black in painfully boring detail, ultimately dismisses him as CEO and charges him of accepting unauthorized non-compete payments from companies buying newspapers from Hollinger. The nex t three chapters explore Black’s tarnished public image and dwindling personal wealth as he is relieved of all directorships and is permanently ousted from Hollinger International. In Chapter 7, Black is charged with new S. E. C. civil infractions following the release of â€Å"A Corporate Kleptocracy†, a report (by Richard Breeeden) on Hollinger’s practices. The momentum picks up again at the conclusion of chapter 9, asBlack recounts being secretly videotaped while clearing out his Toronto offices; his actions land him with charges of obstruction of justice. Over the next four chapters, Black recounts his trial process and ends his story with the final hearing in Chicago that found him guilty. One of the first weaknesses a keen reader will spot is that Black struggles to find an appropriate voice in the two hundred pages of the book. He attempts at a conversational tone, but comes off as oddly detached. The lack of a definitive theme is also due to Blackâ€℠¢s breezy narrative that dashes from one key life event to the next.He jumps from his university days, to advising the Prime Minister of Britain, to the 1996 London bombings. Though enjoyable, these are only longing reminiscences of an imprisoned man, rather than key elements of his harrowing journey that forms the remainder of the book. In fact, it is only in page 269 that readers see Black defending the principles he alludes to in the book’s title. That being said, these sundry recollections offer readers a respite from detailed corporate machinations, which are also present in the first two hundred pages of the book.Black risks losing his readers when he delves into corporate debt reorganizations and share buy-backs that are both boring and confusing to the non-business mind. Hence, the narrative remains almost disjointed in the first third of the book, until Black is stripped of his title at Hollinger International, setting in motion the events that form the bulk of the b ook. The biggest flaw in the book is Black’s unmistakable bias, as he categorizes individuals based on their stance on his guilt or innocence; those who believe in his innocence are virtuous, while those convinced of his guild are either wrong or misguided.In his own words â€Å"no one except me was telling the truth, but it wasn’t clear who was lying and who was merely mistaken. † Similarly, when court decisions go against him they are hopelessly wrong and indicative of the flaws of the judicial system, but when a decision is made in his favour, it is absolutely correct and undisputed. While it is obvious that the prosecution and conviction of Black is the prism through which the story is told, it becomes tiresome when the readers are incessantly conditioned to view Black as the lone voice of truth in the midst of the deceit and lies.Moreover, the means and the extent to which Black denounces his opponents, perceived or real can be quite off-putting. In Blackâ €™s story, his greatest villains are Richard Breeden and David Radler. Breeden was the former chair of the S. E. C and the man behind the â€Å"Corporate Kleptocracy† report that resulted in Black’s criminal charges. Black’s attack on Breeden is quite spiteful; Black describes him as â€Å"Round, flabby face; dull, lifeless eyes behind thick spectacles†¦with the bloodless, piscine coldness of someone whose power vastly exceeded his intelligence. Radler was a long-time associate of Black’s who made a plea bargain with American prosecutors in exchange for providing evidence against Black. On Radler, he says â€Å"It was naturally a very strange experience listening to his false incrimination of me but also seeing his squinty, evasive eyes†¦he looked like a man bound for the gallows, worn down as much by a knowledge of his own wretchedness as by the impending punishment† Expectably, Black’s acid remarks are not just for Breeden a nd Radler; he slams all those involved in his downfall. On Paul Healy, Hollinger’s V.P. of investor relations, Black says â€Å"he had a little porcine face so puffy it made his spectacles seem smaller†¦ a maladjusted, scheming courtier, alternately fawning and snarling at the hand that fed him for so long. † Black specifically saves a lot of firepower on Eddie Greenspan, his lead defence attorney who fizzled in American courts; he says â€Å"The deterioration of such a man is objectively sad, and is made more so by the inelegance of his acts of denial and displacement of responsibility for his own shortcomings and aggressive paranoia. On the jury that convicted him, he says, â€Å"I was unprepared for such a procession of mainly monosyllabic and listless people. † Such vilifying attacks are a few of many examples of Black’s verbal war on his critics. While his anger towards his critics is understandable, what is frustrating is his tendency to engag e in baseless reporting. For instance, he declares that twenty percent of his fellow inmates were entirely innocent, a number seemingly plucked solely based on his conversations with his fellow inmates.Also according to him, the U. S. government fills its prison system with unemployed visible minorities in order to keep unemployment rate down. Black risks losing his already damaged credibility with such uncorroborated statements. For all of the book’s weaknesses, Black redeems himself, at least partially, with his superb prose and infectious ardour. The book is a delectable read simply based on its literary merits. Some paragraphs are worth rereading just to be admired as works of art.The paragraphs in which he expresses his love and loyalty for his wife, his late brother or even deceased friends are quite moving and stand out as great examples of his powerful prose. Indeed, in the hands of a less assured writer, the story of Black’s clash with his opponents would have been a bombastic mess, but after his initial struggles Black offers a gripping tale of his  ordeal. When Black’s passion for defending his honour is coupled with his mastery of the language, what you get is a riveting experience.The broad ethical issues raised in A Matter of Principle revolve around the integrity of senior executives and ethical corruption. Black’s case is as much about breaking the law as it is getting entangled in ethical gray areas. Tweedy Browne, a U. S investment firm that owned 18% of Hollinger International accused Black and other directors of awarding themselves with unauthorized management payments and millions of dollars of non-competition fees through Ravelston, Black’s personal equity company.Black was ultimately found guilty of a slew of charges including fraud, money laundering and obstruction of justice. Given that Black has penned the book himself, he defends his actions vehemently. He maintains that the Audit Committee explic itly approved the non-competition payments (totalling $80 million). On the management fees, he states that â€Å"the total of what we received had been sharply reduced when we shrank the company. † Overall, the ethical issues in the book highlight the importance of fiduciary duty – the duty of a senior executive to the shareholders of the company.The book also highlights the power of intelligent shareholder activism, as practiced by Tweedy Browne, which ultimately resulted in Black’s downfall. Ultimately, A Matter of Principle is a powerful read. While the book is bogged down with bilious attacks against Black’s critics, it packs a powerful punch. Black’s eloquence in describing the viciousness of the prosecutorial efforts and the harshness of his punishment is breathtaking. His continued insistence on his honesty and innocence is also admirable.His intention with this book does not seem to be to sway readers’ opinions, but rather to settle accounts. Whether he has achieved this or not, one this is for sure, Conrad Black’s story will not fade from memory for many years to come. ——————————————– [ 1 ]. (pg. 46-90), A Matter of Principle [ 2 ]. (pg. 182-198) [ 3 ]. (pg. 142) [ 4 ]. (pg. 135) [ 5 ]. (pg. 392) [ 6 ]. (pg. 401) [ 7 ]. (pg. 418) [ 8 ]. (pg. 277) [ 9 ]. (pg. 465) [ 10 ]. (pg. 514) [ 11 ]. (pg. 146) [ 12 ]. (pg. 96) [ 13 ]. (pg. 97)

The World War II And The Cold War - 1247 Words

The term â€Å"military complex† was made popular by Eisenhower who was the president from 1953 to 1961. The term refers to the marriage of military institutions with economic institutions for the reason of securing the nation However, the structure of the intertwined military, government and civilian was started earlier in the century from about 1915. There were many trial and errors to get the ball rolling on such an impacting and controversial issue. Many boundaries had to be overcome for there to function among these industries with the common ground of providing for the nation while at war. Although war’s affect may touch upon many aspects of life not only in America but any nation at war, blurred lines take the place of division between†¦show more content†¦So it is common for the height of the industrial military complex to be focused on the Cold War and World War II. Yet, the beginning years is when important changes took place and forever changed the i nfrastructure of government regarding military and industry. Due to the massive spending dedicated to weapons and warfare, biological and traditional there is even more of vague divergence between the organizations. How this blending came to be regarding commerce and military started around 1917. The first time the United States had to use its economy to prepare for war was for World War I. Production was not only needed for the war but also, to put the economy at full capacity. Therefore the civilian industry had to be enlisted in the production of supplies for the military. A network was created between federal government, military services and industry. Commerce coupled with this new network laid the groundwork for the complex Eisenhower later described in 1961. At these beginning stages, however, there was a disarray of order to accomplish supplying the military with what it demanded. The lack of power to command organization needed to adhere industry with government was owed to the different schools of thought concerning the governmentâ⠂¬â„¢s role in commerce. On one hand it was thought that the government should stay out of the